What is GSP9700 Road Force Measurement?
Loaded Truth on Tire Force and Runout Measurement to Solve Vibrations
GSP9700 Road Force Measurement (a
roller turning against a tire under high
load) accurately locates and quantifies
the forces in the wheel/tire that cause
non-balance related vibration and radial
tire-pull complaints. The combined effects
of geometric (eccentricity) and constructional
(hidden internal) related issues can
be measured only if a load is placed
against the tire during measurement.
It is the most effective way to quantify
the effect of all items in a tire and
wheel contributing to non-uniformity
of the assembly. Loaded (force) measurement
has been the accepted industrial standard
used by tire and vehicle manufacturers
for over 20 years.
Tire Related Forces Are Revealed Only When Testing Under Load
Road Force Measurement is displayed
in pound force (Lbs.), kilogram force
(Kg.) or Newton (N). There are two major
components analyzed during Road Force
Measurement that contribute to the total non-uniformity
of a tire and wheel assembly: (1) Loaded Runout Measurement
and (2) Tire Stiffness Measurement.
Road Force Measurement uniquely combines
loaded runout (eccentricity) measurement
of the tire-wheel with the effects of
the tire’s overall stiffness. Eccentricity,
when stated in terms of runout alone,
does not quantify the actual force because
the force is dependent on the stiffness
of the tire being measured. Runout does
not necessarily create the same force
from tire to tire. For example, two tires
with the same runout will differ in their
ability to create vibration when a stiff
tire sidewall is compared to a similar
tire with soft sidewall. The stiffness
of the tire will reduce or increase the
eccentricity of the assembly when rolling
under load.
Runout Measurement is
a distance measurement, not a force. Runout
is traditionally measured in thousandths
of inches (0.000”) or hundredths
of millimeters (0.00mm). Runout can be
measured in an unloaded/free state or loaded “road
test” condition. Runout measurement
of a tire is a compromise compared to calculating
forces and is not as effective when diagnosing
vibration problems. Runout measurement
in a loaded “road test” condition
is faster than unloaded runout measurement,
however it is not as effective as calculating
the Road Force since the stiffness effect
of the tire are not taken into consideration.

Runout (Eccentricity) is Only Part
of the Vibration Measurement Needed
Loaded Runout Measurement on
a tire is accomplished with a loaded roller placed
against the footprint. The load roller performs a ‘simulated’ road
test but differs from Road Force Measurement because
tire stiffness is not measured. Loaded runout is
the most effective method of runout measurement that
samples the entire tire footprint. Measuring the
tire footprint with a loaded roller is unlike any
form of tread sampling with unloaded runout. The
tire under load is tested in a similar manner as
it is driven on the road. A loaded runout test is
faster than single area sampling and automatically
averages the runout of the tire footprint. A tire
is compressible and therefore loaded runout measurement
is a preferred method over unloaded runout.
Unloaded Runout Measurement is
a good choice when measuring a non-compressible object
such as a wheel. The best way to measure a wheel is
to average the runout of bead seats. Unloaded runout
of a tire is the least preferred method to quantify
vibration issues. Unloaded runout involves measuring
a small area of the tire such as the center rib. Usually
the center area of the tire is used because unloaded
runout measurement has been proven to be different
at various spots across the tread. The problem with
center tire measurement is that measuring in the center
tread area has the least influence on the actual forces
transmitted to the vehicle. It’s logical that
unloaded runout at the center tread area completely
flattens against the road as the tire rolls. This is
why unloaded runout is the least preferred method to
quantify vibration problems. The wider the aspect ratio
the less any runout in this area will be felt...it's
the sidewall stiffness variation that transmits to
the chassis. Furthermore, tire sidewall variations
and hidden constructional issues in the tire are not
taken into consideration when unloaded runout is measured.
Unloaded runout measurement can not indicate how much
force is being created as a result of the runout since
the tire stiffness can not be measured. Tire shoulders
and other areas not measured may amplify or diminish
the runout (and forces) when measured under load.
In Summary:
Force
The forces generated by a
tire and wheel must be measured by placing
a tire under load. Tire stiffness also
plays a role in force calculations since
this amplifies or diminishes the vibration
effects of the runout measured. Road
Force Measurement Ô uses loaded
runout and tire stiffness measurements
to calculate the actual force created
by the loaded runout alone. For example,
two tires with the same runout will
differ in their ability to create vibration
when a stiff tire sidewall is compared
to a similar sized tire with a soft
sidewall.
Runout
* Loaded – Eccentricity measurement
with a loaded roller measures is a
faster and more accurate sampling and
representation of the average overall
runout of the tire. The shoulder areas
and sidewalls of the tire contribute
greatly to vibration potential and
are also sampled simultaneously. This
is superior than non-contact unloaded
eccentricity measurement at isolated
areas on the tire.
* Unloaded – Tire runout measurement
is problematic and limited in use since
the tire has spring rate and is compressible.
Non-contact runout is limited and not
as repeatable since typically small areas
of the tire face are measured. In most
cases, non-contact, unloaded runout is
used on tires for visual related issues
and is not the best measurement choice
to estimate vibration-causing eccentricities.
A wheel is not compressible in the same
manner as a tire and therefore unloaded
runout is acceptable. The best wheel
measurement for vibration-causing eccentricities
provides two measurements taken at or
near the bead seat area. The two measurements
are vector averaged to find the true
low-point average of the tire bead seat
areas of the rim.
Important:
Runout measurement alone diminishes the
ability to solve tire related vibration
complaints. Unloaded tire runout ignores
(a) constructional forces hidden inside
the tire, (b) sidewall stiffness and ‘spring
rate’ contributions and (c) it samples isolated
areas of the tire instead of the entire footprint.
Locating non-balance related vibration issues might
very well diminish to a “game of chance”.
As a result, the best possible ride quality is diminished
and repair time increases in frequency. The GSP9700 measures loaded runout and
tire stiffness simultaneously...so you
know the magnitude of the vibration force
that occurs when the assembly is mounted
on a vehicle.
Now…here’s the rub. Some “diagnostic” wheel
balancers only measure runout, while others only use
unloaded runout. Don’t confuse runout measurement
with Road Force Measurement. They are not the same.
Sure, knowing runout can be handy at times and without
better equipment it is better than no information at
all… but what you really need to know is, does
the runout create an excessive force when loaded? Is
the runout sufficient to cause a vibration complaint?
Make the right equipment decisions by understanding
the benefits of loaded tire measurement. |